“Solid from the neck up too!” replied his girlfriend, which
drew more than a few laughs and much spluttering of beer.
Come a different sport and a new season and Leeds United
have a similar necessity for solidity; the matter in case here being, in
general, a more consistently solid defence and, in particular, a more
dependable centre back partnership. Amidst the clamour for ‘quality signings’
after Massimo Cellino’s takeover at Elland Road, Leeds supporters are focusing
their worries around these areas – especially at a defence that shipped goal
after goal, at times, like water running through a very large-holed sieve.
Leeds’ final Championship table 2013/14
P
|
W
|
D
|
L
|
CS*
|
F
|
A
|
PTS
|
PPG**
|
|
Leeds
|
46
|
16
|
9
|
21
|
10
|
59
|
67
|
57
|
1.24
|
Promotion Playoff place
|
Automatic Promotion
|
||||||||
72 pts
|
1.57
|
93 pts
|
2.02
|
||||||
Source – Statto.com
* CS – Clean Sheets
** PPG – Points Per Game
This 15th place finish was indicative
of Leeds’ 2013/14 campaign in the Championship; one that had initial promise
yet petered out weakly into a crawl away from relegation and left Leeds’
supporters thinking about what might have been. On Christmas Day 2013, Leeds’
fans were opening their presents, saying their “Thank yous” and looking happily
at a Championship table showing them in the final Playoff place with 34 points;
then it all went wrong, spectacularly wrong.
Leeds’ Championship table pre and post-Christmas.
P
|
W
|
D
|
L
|
CS
|
FTS*
|
F
|
A
|
GD
|
PTS
|
PPG
|
|
03 Aug –
25 Dec
2013
|
21
|
10
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
6
|
32
|
23
|
+9
|
34
|
1.62
|
26 Dec –
03 May
2014
|
25
|
6
|
5
|
14
|
3
|
8
|
27
|
44
|
-17
|
23
|
0.92
|
Source – Statto.com
* FTS – Fail to Score
What can be seen from the pre/post-Christmas tables is that
attacking production dried up and defensive production dropped massively.
Pre-Christmas in the 2013/14 season Leeds United were averaging 1.5 goals per
game; post-Christmas this dropped to 1.08 goals per game. Defensively though,
the figures are much worse – pre-Christmas Leeds were conceding only 1.09 goals
per game; in the period from Christmas up until the season’s end on 3rd
May 2014 Leeds were conceding 1.76 goals per game. Obviously, this defensive
shortfall was the cardinal reason behind Leeds United’s sudden drop in fortunes
and the main reason behind the spiral towards what was a relegation dogfight
which was only eased with 10 points from their final 5 games.
It’s all too easy to single out individual players and say
things such as “Player A commits too many basic errors” or “Player B’s
positioning is awful and he allows the opposition too much time on the ball”
etc. etc. ad nauseum.
What is interesting about Leeds United’s 2013/14
Championship campaign is that they did not have one settled formation with only
minor deviations to suit the playing style of particular opponents or tweaks to
negate opponent’s particular strengths. During the 2013/14 season, Leeds
employed 7 different formations with varying degrees of success.
![]() |
| Picture credit - Birmingham Mail www.birminghammail.co.uk |
Leeds United’s tactical formations – Championship season
2013/14
Games
|
W
|
D
|
L
|
F
|
A
|
Pts |
% of Pts*
|
GF p/g**
|
GA p/g***
|
|
4-4-2
|
13
|
2
|
4
|
7
|
9
|
21
|
10
|
25.64
|
0.7
|
1.61
|
5-3-2
|
13
|
6
|
3
|
4
|
22
|
15
|
21
|
53.85
|
1.7
|
1.15
|
4-1-2-1-2
|
8
|
3
|
-
|
5
|
6
|
11
|
9
|
37.5
|
0.75
|
1.36
|
4-3-3
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
7
|
7
|
46.67
|
2
|
1.4
|
3-5-2
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
12
|
6
|
10
|
66.67
|
2.4
|
1.2
|
3-4-3
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
4-5-1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Source – Whoscored.com
*% of Pts – percentage of points available
** GF p/g – Goals For per game
*** GA p/g – Goals Against per game
The two most numerously deployed formations by Leeds United,
the standard 4-4-2 and the more defensively-minded 5-3-2 (deployed 13 times
each so covering 57% of Leeds games in the 2013/14 Championship season)
returned differing fortunes for the team. The other tactical formations that
were used collectively returned 43% of the available points (obviously) and
with a GF p/g of 1 and a GA p/g of 1.55. Statistically-speaking, the 5-3-2
formation employed by Leeds was the one that reaped the most rewards for them
with an overall return of 21 points (from a maximum of 39 available) and
yielding GF p/g and GA p/g figures of 1.7 and 1.15 respectively; these figures
being akin to those achieved by the 6th placed team at the end of
the season.
However, I’d like to throw another spanner in the works to
highlight just how effective the 5-3-2 formation was for Leeds United
during the 2013/14 Championship
campaign. It was employed in two main blocks: one was between 26th
October (game vs Huddersfield – a 3-2 loss) to 1st January (game vs
Blackburn – a 2-1 loss) whilst the other was 3 games towards the end of the
season; these being vs Blackpool (2-0 win), vs Barnsley (1-0 win) and finally
vs Derby (1-1 draw). If we look at its deployment as part of the run up to 25th
December, as part of the first run of 5-3-2 games, it makes interesting
reading. This is further compounded if we than look at the fortunes of the team
after it was then neglected after 1st January loss to Blackburn
before being picked up again for the 2-0 win against Blackpool on April 12th.
Table comparing Leeds United’s performance with/without
using 5-3-2 formation
Games played using 5-3-2 formation
26-10-13 to 25-12-13
|
|||||||||||
P
|
W
|
D
|
L
|
CS
|
FTS
|
F
|
A
|
GD
|
PTS
|
PPG*
|
RANK**
|
9
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
18
|
10
|
+8
|
17
|
1.89
|
3rd
|
Games played without using 5-3-2
formation 01-01-14 to 11.04.14
|
|||||||||||
17
|
3
|
3
|
11
|
1
|
7
|
17
|
35
|
-18
|
12
|
0.71
|
23rd
|
Source – Statto.com
* PPG – Points per game
** RANK – Rank in division based on figures
When looking at it as starkly as this, the top section of
the table, with a PPG figure of 1.89 is equivalent to what Derby County
achieved with their 3rd place finish in the Championship last season
(actual PPG for Derby was 1.85). Conversely, the lower section of the table,
with a PPG figure of only 0.71 is actually lower than the end of season PPG
figure achieved by the bottom club Yeovil Town (who finished on 37 points and
with a PPG figure of 0.80).
Looking at Leeds United’s performance in this light shows
two things: how well the 5-3-2 system worked for them last season in putting
them into a strong position as potential promotion playoff contenders by
Christmas and also that, after it was abandoned following the 2-1 loss to
Blackburn on January 1st, Leeds went into the freefall form most
likened to ‘nailed-on’ relegation candidates.
Now I’m not advocating that if Leeds had adopted the 5-3-2
across the whole of the 46 game season that they’d have finished up in a
playoff position, but it is interesting to note that once they abandoned its
use at the turn of 2014 their season took on a whole different perspective.
It will be interesting to see what Coach Hockaday utilises
next season as his ‘go-to’ formation; that will largely depend on the personnel
left over from the 2013/14 campaign and what other players are drafted in to
accompany new outfield signings Gerardo Berardi (signed from Sampdoria),
Tommaso Bianchi (signed from Sassuolo) and Souleymane Doukara (signed from
Catania)

No comments:
Post a Comment